2012: Nose height Regulations

There are a few regulations already included for the 2012 technical regulations, in the small section added to the end of the 2011 tech regs are a few brief lines that will irreversibly alter an F1 cars appearance. Plus significantly affect the aerodynamics.
The move towards lower noses has been one of the safety aims of the Technical Working Group (TWG). It’s long been feared a car striking another with a high nose will likely make any accident worse. Both in the case of nose to wheel contact or a nose T-boning another car. So a lower nose will help prevent cars flipping or being penetrated in these instances.
A secondary benefit could also be improved visibility for the driver, as the front of the chassis and nose will be lower, obstructing the view far less than the very high humped noses of late.
A supplementary benefit is that the already limited space to aerodynamic devices under the raised chassis will be further eliminated. This area still housing turning vanes and flow conditioners, even after the drastic 2009 aero rules changes.
So to achieve their aims the TWG and FIA have agreed a two step reduction on nose height. When we talk of noses there are two elements to this. Firstly the nose tip, this is the very visible, end of the nose cone structure. Then secondly the front bulkhead (referred to by the FIA as section A-A), this is where the nose cone mounts to the chassis.
This reduction in height starts in 2012 with the nose limited to a 55cm height and then in 2014 the nose tip must fit into a zone just 25cm high.

Current nose

In 2011 the nose could be as high as 650mm along its entire length

Currently there are few practical restrictions on nose height; the 2009 aero regs did prevent bodywork being added high up to the top of the nose, such as the bridge wings and antler horns we saw in 2008.
What is controlled is the overall height and the size of the key bulkheads on the front of the chassis forming the footwell area. This area is defined by two pairs of dimensions affecting the front bulkhead (FIA section A-A) and the dash bulkhead (FIA section B-B). Further controlling their placement is their distance from the cockpit opening, they must be vertical and the taper between them must be linear.
These bulkheads need to be a minimum depth of 27.5cm and 40cm respectively. Both of these bulkheads cannot be higher than 62.5cm above the reference plane. Drawn literally the front of the chassis could be a flat topped section from the dash bulkhead all the way forward to the nose tip. Teams tend to have an angled upper surface to the nose cone and a “V” cross section to the front bulkhead, to make the surfaces a more efficient aerodynamic shape.  The rules specify a 25mm radius that can be aplied to the edges of the chassis.  Its these, that teams exploit to get the smallest possible cross section at the front of the car.
Height and cross section in this area is critical as teams want a minimal cross section in between the front wheels and as much space underneath to fit bodywork to direct airflow to around and under the sidepods. So teams will tend to raise these bulkheads as high as they can go.

2012 nose

For 2012 two regulations will limit these very high front chassis designs. The front bulkhead can still be 62.5cm above the reference plane, But an area ahead of that (shaded yellow in the above picture) must be no higher than 55cm.  There being a 7.5cm drop between these two surfaces, with some 15cm in which to merge the step created inbetween them.

Taken to the limits of height and minimal cross section, a 2012 nose will be an ugly proposition, the flat topped nose cone at 55cm meeting the front bulkhead at 62.6cm high. This footwell section of monocoque extending all the way back to the dash bulkhead.

Smoothing the transition between the nose and chassis is the radiussed “V” shape.  the rules simply specify a 25mm radius to each edge of the chassis, but teams have exploited this radius. So rather than a 90-degree arc, they take the radius around 180-degrees and then again at 90-degrees to form the bulged shoulders of the chassis.  Red Bull have been one of the most prominent exponents of aplying this radius.  By appliying this radius, the actual cross section of the nose is reduced to less than the 275mm x 300mm rectangle its supposed to form.  The FIA have made efforts to prevent this practice becoming any more extreme, so the front bulkhead must not be any less than 22cm at any point in the middle 15cm of the structure.

2012 solutions
Its likely teams will still opt for a minimum cross section and maximum height section in between the front and dash bulkheads. But the nose cone design will be the biggest variable, this will be dependant on their approach in creating the onset flow conditions for the floor and sidepods. To alter the flow they have just a few small areas of body to influence the airflow; the front wing itself, the wings mounting pylons, the space directly under the nose cone and the area above the splitter.

Front wing
Front wing design will continue to follow the ever more sculpted path we’ve seen this year. As will the front wing mounting pylons, which will probably continue to lengthen within the tight definitions of their cross sectional area.

Nose devices
Space under the nose cone is limited, teams will no doubt sculpt the structure of the nose cone to maximise space beneath it, in a similar fashion to what Mercedes have achieved this year. Then making use of that space means probably two directions will be tried.
Firstly, a relatively high nose tip feeding a small pair of conventional turning vanes. This will be a downscaled version of what most teams do this year.
Or secondly, go for a snow plough device under the nose. This was first used by Williams in 2009 and adopted by McLaren since 2010. Again with a relatively high nose tip, a horizontal curving vane sits below it, this both creates downforce and creates the powerful wake to direct airflow towards the floor. Is interesting to note Force India did a lot of testing in Friday practice with this format nose, but have never chose to race it. Perhaps they were evaluating ideas for 2012?

Splitter devices.
Just as in 2009 teams found they had less space for undernose turning vanes, so they made use of the free space above the splitter. This could either be with small vertical vanes, their outswept shape both diverting the airflow around the car and also sending a vortex towards the floors leading edge, to maximise pressure for more downforce.
We’ve also seen that idea turned sideways, such as Brawns 2009 snowplough, also copied in 2010 by Williams. A curved transverse vane is fitted across the splitter. This is a blunt solution, as the vane catches the airflow literally like a snowplough, sending a strong vortex to increase the pressure ahead of the floor.

With some smoothing and optimisation the front end, 2012 cars should not need to look like my first literal drawing of the nose. But we will see some old ideas reinvented and a lot of variation in team’s interpretation of the new rules.


24 thoughts on “2012: Nose height Regulations

  1. Pingback: LA F1 2012 CAMBIA MUSO…COME? COSI’! « Motorsport Rants

  2. Good piece. I’m eagerly anticipating testing-2012. Personally, I have always been partial to the nose on the Ferrari 412 and the Williams FW14. They just look aggressive. I don’t figure that we will see that for a while, but I can always hope.

    • I’ve always thought those early 90s, low-nose F1 cars looked the best of the heavily aero influenced designs. Maybe after these regs changes the FIA can mandate a single attachment point between nose and FW with a minimum surface area. Just to make the cars look good! 🙂

  3. On the flipside – would it be possible to utilize the exhaust to make it to harder for other cars to overtake, i.e. creating more turbulence behind and to either side of the car ?

    • In my studies, drag is the consequence of angle of attack! Drag kicks off a car’s wings and is converted into turbulent air, “Chaotic air” its give or take! correct me if I am wrong.

  4. I too look forward to getting rid of the ugly platypus noses, and going back to some more elegant designs.

    I wonder if we see such extremes, such as the “anteater’ nose of the 2003 MP4-18?

    I know aero always drives nose shapes, but I feel the teams have followed each other somewhat in the trend to high noses. It seems to go through cycles. Surely there a some big C of G gains in lowering all that mass??

    I bet a few teams will be extolling the virtues of this at the car launches….

  5. Scarbs, do you think McLaren might enjoy a learning benefit with their current nose being close to or even within next-year’s rules?

  6. I think with regards to Force India that you mentioned at the end, it’s some sort of low drag option as they ran it on race weekends during Canada and Italy. I think this is what you’re talking about?

    Monza: http://motorsport.nextgen-auto.com/gallery/pictures/2011/f1/gp-italy-race/095_medium.jpg
    Montreal: http://motorsport.nextgen-auto.com/gallery/pictures/2011/f1/gp-canada-race/115_medium.jpg

    Compared to their ‘normal’ higher drag/downforce nose:

    Noida: http://motorsport.nextgen-auto.com/gallery/pictures/2011/f1/gp-india-race/027_medium.jpg

    • No the Force India nose I spoke of was the snowplough solution tested at quite a few mid season races. But, you are right that their undernose bump is removed for high speed races.

  7. Pingback: Ferrari 663 według Giorgio Piola | F1TALKS.PL - BLOG F1, FILMY F1

  8. Pingback: 2012: Technical Regulations Published | Scarbsf1's Blog

  9. The most beautiful nose bar none was the Mclaren MP4/8.

    Why of why can’t the FIA just enforce a low nose? The 2012 are almost identical to 2011.

  10. Pingback: ⇒ Formel 1 Saison 2012 (S.4): De la Rosa ist wieder dabei. ...

  11. Pingback: First analysis: Caterham CT-01 | Scarbsf1's Blog

  12. Pingback: McLaren MP4/27 Launched | Formula One Art & Genius

  13. Pingback: Revealed (one hour ago): The new McLaren MP4-27 FI

  14. Pingback: Launch Analysis: McLaren Mercedes MP4-27 | Scarbsf1's Blog

  15. Pingback: Formula 1 2012 New Race Car Launches - Page 2

  16. Pingback: Anonymous

  17. I personally think that after looking from different angles of shots in practice,qualifing, to the big race last year and the year before this, is quite simple, the reason why Red Bull have now won back to back F1 world constructers championships for the past two years, that has made Sebastian Vettel double F1 world Champion is quite simple, that there front wing is that low to floor or race track, it simply gives them the best downforce and grip that any car needs to allow amount of airflow, to simply be distributed underneath the car, thus giving that grip and speed needed to outpace there rivals for the past two years, and so unless any of the other teams don’t see what is happening, will mean that Red Bull F1 will become so dominant from now on, that no other team will get any where near them, thus giving Red Bull the victories and titles with ease and leave its rivlas way behind. Adrian Newey you are a genius at work, in other words Mclarens loss, Red Bulls massive gain….remember to front wing is the key to Red Bulls success.

  18. this may show my general ignorance, but following the trend for stepped nose designs – esp Ferrari’s – does the step and resulting drag give any benefit in actual downforce, given that the step is generally in line with the axle points for the front wheels?

    or is it just drag which is easily overcome by the benefit of the more open area under the nose?

    Just a touch surprised as to how agressive the step has been on some cars… Ferrari probably need the space to accommodate the new suspension layout, but stil…

  19. I’m a new visitor to your site, and cannot tell you how helpful that it has been, towards those like myself, who are technically challenged….thanks Craig!!!!

  20. Pingback: Okay...Williams return to the sharper end of things...take 2? - The highs and lows of sport as told through twitter

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s